000010195 001__ 10195
000010195 005__ 20141205155702.0
000010195 04107 $$aeng
000010195 046__ $$k2008-10-12
000010195 100__ $$aHaugen, Ellen D.
000010195 24500 $$aA Comparative Study of Empirical Models for Landslide Prediction Using Historical Case Histories

000010195 24630 $$n14.$$pProceedings of the 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering
000010195 260__ $$b
000010195 506__ $$arestricted
000010195 520__ $$2eng$$aLandslides are one of the most damaging earthquake geohazard phenomena that have created considerable socio-economic losses in the past. Therefore, it is important to find out where and in what shaking conditions landslide can occur. This paper assesses the performance of two empirical models, i.e. the California method and USGS method, for the prediction of earthquake-induced landslides based on a number of ground motion parameters. The models are implemented in four case histories and the results compared with reality. It has been observed that the results obtained do not quite agree because the California method uses the peak ground acceleration of the earthquake motion while the USGS method uses the Arias intensity. The USGS method has also been compared to historical data and proved to be within the limit boundaries of the compiled data.

000010195 540__ $$aText je chráněný podle autorského zákona č. 121/2000 Sb.
000010195 653__ $$aLandslides, earthquake, displacement, slope stability, case histories.

000010195 7112_ $$a14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering$$cBejing (CN)$$d2008-10-12 / 2008-10-17$$gWCEE15
000010195 720__ $$aHaugen, Ellen D.$$iKaynia, Amir M.
000010195 8560_ $$ffischerc@itam.cas.cz
000010195 8564_ $$s313793$$uhttps://invenio.itam.cas.cz/record/10195/files/04-02-0022.pdf$$yOriginal version of the author's contribution as presented on CD, Paper ID: 04-02-0022.
000010195 962__ $$r9324
000010195 980__ $$aPAPER