000011067 001__ 11067
000011067 005__ 20141205155832.0
000011067 04107 $$aeng
000011067 046__ $$k2008-10-12
000011067 100__ $$aMoss, Robb Eric S.
000011067 24500 $$aComparing Liquefaction Procedures in the U.S.and China

000011067 24630 $$n14.$$pProceedings of the 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering
000011067 260__ $$b
000011067 506__ $$arestricted
000011067 520__ $$2eng$$aLiquefaction is a common occurrence in seismic areas in the United States and China. These countries use different methods to evaluate the potential for liquefaction. This paper compares the standard-of-practice and state-of-the-art analysis methods in both countries to determine the similarities and differences. Results are presented on method compatibility, method disagreement, and what can be learned from this comparison. Of particular importance is how the influence of fines content and/or clay fraction is treated. It is found that “clean” sand triggering curves are in general agreement between the two countries but when sandy soils contain fines the use of clay fraction as a controlling variable is not recommended because it may result in unconservative results.

000011067 540__ $$aText je chráněný podle autorského zákona č. 121/2000 Sb.
000011067 653__ $$aliquefaction, triggering, clay fraction, fines content, probabilistic

000011067 7112_ $$a14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering$$cBejing (CN)$$d2008-10-12 / 2008-10-17$$gWCEE15
000011067 720__ $$aMoss, Robb Eric S.$$iChen, Guoxing X.
000011067 8560_ $$ffischerc@itam.cas.cz
000011067 8564_ $$s198068$$uhttps://invenio.itam.cas.cz/record/11067/files/S06-001.pdf$$yOriginal version of the author's contribution as presented on CD, Paper ID: S06-001.
000011067 962__ $$r9324
000011067 980__ $$aPAPER