000013455 001__ 13455
000013455 005__ 20161114165554.0
000013455 04107 $$aeng
000013455 046__ $$k2011-05-25
000013455 100__ $$aMoshref, A.
000013455 24500 $$aComparison of Different Nonlinear Static Analysis Used for Seismic Assessment of Existing Buildings

000013455 24630 $$n3.$$pComputational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earhquake Engineering
000013455 260__ $$bNational Technical University of Athens, 2011
000013455 506__ $$arestricted
000013455 520__ $$2eng$$aThe present study is focused on the comparison of non-linear static analysis (Pushover) which is used by two major guidance documents, the New Zealand guideline and the US FEMA 440, on the assessment of existing buildings currently available for moment resisting concrete frames. The main purpose of the study is to trace the differences in the results produced by these two guidelines. For this, three different moment resisting concrete frames are assessed under these two guidelines to determine the PGA value that causes their collapse. In the next step, these are compared by their similar values that are determined from the nonlinear dynamic analysis in which Park and Ang damage index is used as acceptance criteria for components. As is found, the result of force based approach which is proposed by New Zealand guideline is more compatible with the nonlinear dynamic analysis.

000013455 540__ $$aText je chráněný podle autorského zákona č. 121/2000 Sb.
000013455 653__ $$aRetrofitting, Pushover Analysis, Moment Resisting Frames, Damage Index.

000013455 7112_ $$aCOMPDYN 2011 - 3rd International Thematic Conference$$cIsland of Corfu (GR)$$d2011-05-25 / 2011-05-28$$gCOMPDYN2011
000013455 720__ $$aMoshref, A.$$iMoghaddasi S., M.$$iTehranizadeh, M.
000013455 8560_ $$ffischerc@itam.cas.cz
000013455 8564_ $$s514671$$uhttps://invenio.itam.cas.cz/record/13455/files/128.pdf$$yOriginal version of the author's contribution as presented on CD, section: MS 26 Seismic Safety Assessment of Structures.
000013455 962__ $$r13401
000013455 980__ $$aPAPER