000018877 001__ 18877
000018877 005__ 20170118182245.0
000018877 04107 $$aeng
000018877 046__ $$k2017-01-09
000018877 100__ $$aPoland, Chris
000018877 24500 $$aA Case Study of Earthquake Resilience Data Practices: 2010-2011 Canterbury Earthquakes Disaster

000018877 24630 $$n16.$$pProceedings of the 16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering
000018877 260__ $$b
000018877 506__ $$arestricted
000018877 520__ $$2eng$$aIn March 2014, an interdisciplinary research team travelled to New Zealand to study issues related to Canterbury’s recovery from the 2010-2011 earthquake sequence. One goal of the overall project is to evolve the practice of earthquake reconnaissance from immediate post-disaster investigations to learning about community recovery from earthquakes over the long-term. Towards this end, the aim of the New Zealand case study described here is to understand how stakeholders in New Zealand are measuring, monitoring, and acting upon data-driven indicators of recovery after the Canterbury earthquakes. The research team interviewed a wide range of decision-makers and researchers in the Christchurch region. A broad cross-section of organizations are represented in the qualitative data collected for the study, including Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Authority, Christchurch City Council, and Stronger Christchurch Infrastructure Rebuild Team, as well as 22 other organizations. Initial evaluation of the study data shows that a large variety of data are being collected as part of the recovery, for example a region-wide survey of wellbeing, but it does not appear the available data contributed significantly to ongoing decision making. The large volume of data made it challenging for organizations to analyze and interpret it for decision-making. The public health sector, however, seems to be an exemplar for using data for recovery decision-making. Data describing social vulnerability, homelessness, out-migration, business recovery, and the rental market were found to be less well documented. And while the disaster motivated unprecedented levels of data sharing within and between public and private organizations, privacy concerns and siloes still presented challenges. For future disasters, a possible role for outside experts typically involved in earthquake reconnaissance could be the facilitation of analysis of existing data, promoting access to data that can be compared across disasters, and specific guidance on what data should be collected by researchers to be archived for future cross case study comparison.

000018877 540__ $$aText je chráněný podle autorského zákona č. 121/2000 Sb.
000018877 653__ $$aresilience; reconnaissance; Christchurch

000018877 7112_ $$a16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering$$cSantiago (CL)$$d2017-01-09 / 2017-01-13$$gWCEE16
000018877 720__ $$aPoland, Chris$$iXiao, Yu$$iHedley, Nick$$iMiles, Scott$$iRitchie, Liesel
000018877 8560_ $$ffischerc@itam.cas.cz
000018877 8564_ $$s147667$$uhttps://invenio.itam.cas.cz/record/18877/files/2397.pdf$$yOriginal version of the author's contribution as presented on USB, paper 2397.
000018877 962__ $$r16048
000018877 980__ $$aPAPER