000019549 001__ 19549
000019549 005__ 20170118182323.0
000019549 04107 $$aeng
000019549 046__ $$k2017-01-09
000019549 100__ $$aSteidl, Jamison
000019549 24500 $$aInstrumented Field Sites and Liquefaction Monitoring in the United States

000019549 24630 $$n16.$$pProceedings of the 16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering
000019549 260__ $$b
000019549 506__ $$arestricted
000019549 520__ $$2eng$$aInstrumented geotechnical field sites are designed to capture the infrequent but critically important in situ case histories of ground response, deformation, and liquefaction during significant earthquakes that generate high intensity ground shaking and large strains. The University of California at Santa Barbara has been monitoring densely instrumented geotechnical array field sites for almost three decades. Currently these field sites include the Wildlife Liquefaction Array (WLA), the Borrego Valley Downhole Array (BVDA), the Garner Valley Downhole Array (GVDA), the Hollister Earthquake Observatory (HEO), the San Jose 101/280 Interchange Array (SJI), the Seattle Liquefaction Array (SLA), and the Delaney Park Array (DPK). The sites are geographically distributed throughout the most hazardous part of the United States, including three sites in southern California, two sites in central California, one Pacific Northwest site in Seattle, and one site in Anchorage Alaska. The design objective of these sites is to capture the penultimate earthquake in each region and instrumental observations of the earthquake effects associated with such events. The broader objective is to capture a suite of earthquakes covering a range of ground motions and strain levels at each of these sites, to enable calibration of ground motion prediction models that include the effects of the near-surface geology from linear through nonlinear behavior. The WLA, BVDA, GVDA, and HEO sites are maintained solely by UCSB, while the SJI, SLA, and DPK sites are maintained by the corresponding regional seismic network and the United States Geological Survey (USGS), with some assistance from UCSB. UCSB provides access to the instrumental case histories generated by earthquake recordings at these field sites (as well as co-located instrumented structures at some of the sites), through a web-based data dissemination portal (http://www.nees.ucsb.edu/data-portal). Highlights of the last decade of monitoring include the newest liquefaction monitoring facility in Seattle, Washington, the recently re-instrumented San Jose 101/280 interchange array, and more than a dozen observations of excess pore pressure generation during earthquake shaking at two facilities in southern California, with PGA ranges from 0.05g to 0.33g and strains from 10-5 to 2x10-3. Enhancements to the facilities include long-term monitoring of an Induced Partial Saturation (IPS) test pad for liquefaction mitigation, and permanently deployed cross-hole hammer source and receivers for examining shear modulus degradation and recovery following earthquakes. Contributing these case histories for the development and validation of models that predict site response, liquefaction initiation, ground displacements and settlement, and soil-foundation-structure interaction effects, is the ultimate goal of this monitoring effort.

000019549 540__ $$aText je chráněný podle autorského zákona č. 121/2000 Sb.
000019549 653__ $$aEngineering Seismology; Site Effects; Borehole Arrays; Liquefaction; Nonlinear Soil Response

000019549 7112_ $$a16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering$$cSantiago (CL)$$d2017-01-09 / 2017-01-13$$gWCEE16
000019549 720__ $$aSteidl, Jamison$$iHegarty, Paul
000019549 8560_ $$ffischerc@itam.cas.cz
000019549 8564_ $$s2857767$$uhttps://invenio.itam.cas.cz/record/19549/files/3872.pdf$$yOriginal version of the author's contribution as presented on USB, paper 3872.
000019549 962__ $$r16048
000019549 980__ $$aPAPER