THE EFFECT OF INPUT MOTION SELECTION STRATEGIES ON NONLINEAR GROUND RESPONSE PREDICTIONS


Abstract eng:
Ground response prediction is a key tool in the seismic design of earth structures. The prediction is mainly governed by three factors, namely the bedrock motions, the nonlinear characteristics of the soil deposit and the corresponding initial shear wave velocity profile. This study focuses on the first factor by analysing the effect of five different earthquake selection/scaling strategies on the results of nonlinear ground response. The analyses are interpreted in terms of spectral response and engineering demand parameters (EDPs) at ground surface, including the relative horizontal displacement, the peak ground acceleration (PGA) and the spectral acceleration at the first natural period of the soil deposit (Sa(T1)). An ideal 50 m soft clay deposit is analysed using a kinematic hardening soil constitutive model implemented in a fully coupled finite element procedure. The results of the advanced nonlinear ground response analyses indicate that, for two different seismic intensity levels, all the selection strategies lead to similar spectral responses at around T1, with the exception of PGA scaling. Furthermore, the spectral matching strategy leads to a smaller variability in the EDP results. It is also found that the design response spectrum proposed by EC8 for a soft soil deposit does not seem to be fully representative of the possible future earthquake events, thus requiring a revision.

Contributors:
Publisher:
National Technical University of Athens, 2017
Conference Title:
Conference Title:
COMPDYN 2017 - 6th International Thematic Conference
Conference Venue:
Rhodes Island (GR)
Conference Dates:
2017-06-15 / 2017-06-17
Rights:
Text je chráněný podle autorského zákona č. 121/2000 Sb.



Record appears in:



 Record created 2017-06-22, last modified 2017-06-22


Original version of the author's contribution as presented on CD, section: [RS11] Nonlinear dynamics .:
Download fulltext
PDF

Rate this document:

Rate this document:
1
2
3
 
(Not yet reviewed)