INELASTIC RESPONSE OF MASONRY INFILLED REINFORCED CONCRETE STRUCTURES


Abstract eng:
It is well known that masonry infill walls, although non-engineered and considered as non-structural, may provide most of the earthquake resistance and prevent collapse of relatively flexible and weak RC structures. The objective of this study is to investigate the effect of masonry infill walls with openings on the performance of reinforced concrete frames under lateral loads. Specifically, this study is concerned with the evaluation of inelastic parameters of masonry infilled reinforced concrete buildings. Buildings with various heights are selected and designed according to EC8. Inelastic pushover analyses are performed and local and global strength and inelastic deformation characteristics are evaluated. The influence of various parameters, such as the number of storeys, the distribution of infill walls, their strength and their opening percentage on the seismic response of the buildings is thoroughly examined. The results from nonlinear pushover analyses indicate that the overstrength and ductility of RC buildings can be higher than the values considered in the design. The presence of infill walls increases considerably the stiffness of the structures and their global resistance to lateral loads. However, the irregular distribution of infills (soft storey – case of pilotis) significantly reduces the capacity of the structure.

Contributors:
Publisher:
National Technical University of Athens, 2017
Conference Title:
Conference Title:
COMPDYN 2017 - 6th International Thematic Conference
Conference Venue:
Rhodes Island (GR)
Conference Dates:
2017-06-15 / 2017-06-17
Rights:
Text je chráněný podle autorského zákona č. 121/2000 Sb.



Record appears in:



 Record created 2017-06-22, last modified 2017-06-22


Original version of the author's contribution as presented on CD, section: [MS38] Computational Strategies and Assessment of In-Plane and Out-Of-Plane Seismic Response of Infilled Frames .:
Download fulltext
PDF

Rate this document:

Rate this document:
1
2
3
 
(Not yet reviewed)