000022869 001__ 22869
000022869 005__ 20220110134531.0
000022869 04107 $$aeng
000022869 046__ $$k2018-05-14
000022869 100__ $$aŠebek, F.
000022869 24500 $$aStandard tensile test compared to the small punch test of aluminium alloy

000022869 24630 $$n24.$$pEngineering Mechanics 2018
000022869 260__ $$bInstitute of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics of the Cech Academy of Sciences, Prague
000022869 506__ $$arestricted
000022869 520__ $$2eng$$aThe paper deals with certain similarities in results of standard tensile testing and small punch tests. The study is conducted using wrought aluminium alloy 2024-T351, which is solution heat treated, stressrelieved stretched and then cold worked. This aerospace alloy has been rarely used in small punch testing, but it is well documented by standard testing techniques. Basic mechanical properties obtained by two distinct methods are compared and main consequences of the empirical estimations from the small punch testing are concluded.

000022869 540__ $$aText je chráněný podle autorského zákona č. 121/2000 Sb.
000022869 653__ $$aclearance, failure, damage accumulation, finite elements, plasticity

000022869 7112_ $$aEngineering Mechanics 2018$$cSvratka, CZ$$d2018-05-14 / 2018-05-17$$gEM2018
000022869 720__ $$aŠebek, F.$$iKubík, P.$$iPetruška, J.
000022869 8560_ $$ffischerc@itam.cas.cz
000022869 8564_ $$s505869$$uhttps://invenio.itam.cas.cz/record/22869/files/745.pdf$$yOriginal version of the author's contribution in proceedings, page , section SOL.
000022869 962__ $$r21225
000022869 980__ $$aPAPER