Cultural heritage policies: a new framework for our past


Abstract eng:
The concept of cultural heritage has gone through changes that have introduced a new way of conceiving it as a ‘resource for sustainable development and quality of life in a constantly evolving society’ (Council of Europe, 2005a: 2). Hence, cultural heritage is not only important in itself but also for the ‘contribution it can make to other policies’ (Council of Europe, 2005b: 2). Cultural heritage policies, thus, increasingly consider the interrelation between the economy, society, and culture. In fact, often, cultural heritage policies are devised as instruments to reach other scopes: boost tourism, stimulate the construction industry, create jobs in a moment of economic recession, and foster social inclusion. The economic crisis of 2008, with the public budget cuts and private donations reduction that have followed, has implied for many countries the need to find new ways to finance cultural heritage or to reorganise cultural heritage institutions, in order to reduce and/or rationalize costs. This work aims at providing an illustration of the way cultural heritage policies are designed and implemented in several countries. It will consider the objectives, the institutions responsible for policies implementation and the way implementation takes place, i.e. the tools used for it. Special attention is devoted to highlight those changes connected to the shift in the way of conceiving cultural heritage and to the economic crisis.

Contributors:
Publisher:
Green Lines Institute for Sustainable Development, Barcelos, Portugal
Conference Title:
Conference Title:
4th International Conference on Heritage and Sustainable Development
Conference Venue:
Guimarães (Pt)
Conference Dates:
2014-07-22 / 2014-07-25
Rights:
Text je chráněný podle autorského zákona č. 121/2000 Sb.



Record appears in:



 Record created 2014-11-04, last modified 2014-11-18


Original version of the author's contribution as presented on CD, , page 213. :
Download fulltext
PDF

Rate this document:

Rate this document:
1
2
3
 
(Not yet reviewed)