1.
|
In the seismic performance assessment of existing Reinforced Concrete buildings, non-ductile failures related to beam-column joint regions can represent a critical issue. [...]
|
2.
|
The assessment of seismic performance of existing bridge structures is a primary issue, especially in regions where most of bridges have been realized without proper deta [...]
|
3.
|
In the Mediterranean area, Reinforced Concrete (RC) buildings are usually provided of Unreinforced Masonry (URM) infill wall panels. When subjected to seismic action, the [...]
|
4.
|
The seismic performance of existing Reinforced Concrete (RC) frames is significantly affected by the behaviour of beam-column intersections involved in the collapse mecha [...]
|
5.
|
Unreinforced Masonry (URM) infills are widely used in Reinforced Concrete (RC) structures in Mediterranean countries. URM infills are subjected to the seismic action in t [...]
|
6.
|
The assessment of seismic performance of existing bridge structures that have been constructed without appropriate details to support seismic loadings is a primary issue [...]
|
7.
|
There is a growing need for numerical models simulating the non-linear behavior of Reinforced Concrete (RC) elements under seismic loads into inelastic range, and for cap [...]
|
8.
|
The need to quickly and accurately estimate the number of involved people, dead and the injured, missing people and homeless represent a topic issue in the emergency mana [...]
|
9.
|
Italian and Spanish seismic codes prescribe lower behaviour factor (q) for wide-beam reinforced concrete moment resisting frames (WBF) with respect to conventional q fact [...]
|
10.
|
Current formulations proposed by Eurocode 8 part 3 for the inelastic deformations of existing reinforced concrete members are assessed aimed at finding out whether they a [...]
|