|
1.
|
Post-seismic investigations repeatedly indicate that structures having frequencies close to foundation soil frequencies exhibit significantly heavier damages (Caracas 196 [...]
|
|
2.
|
One of the objectives of the PRENOLIN project is the assessment of uncertainties associated with non-linear simulation of 1D site effects. An international benchmark is u [...]
|
|
3.
|
Data provided by accelerometric networks are important for seismic hazard assessment. They are key to derive Ground Motion Prediction Equations (GMPEs). The correct use o [...]
|
|
4.
|
A key scientific component in Seismic Hazards Analysis (SHA) is the assessment of a local hazard for hard rock sites (1000 < V S30 < 3000 m/s), either for applicati [...]
|
|
5.
|
The InterPacific project (Intercomparison of methods for site parameter and velocity profile characterization) aims to assess the reliability of seismic site characteriza [...]
|
|
6.
|
The behavior of earthquake stress-drop magnitude scaling has been the topic of significant debate in the earthquake source community over the past two decades. Methodolog [...]
|
|
7.
|
Given the very large length of embankments along rivers and channels, there is a need for a reliable, simple and affordable method to assess the stability of these struct [...]
|
|
8.
|
It is currently admitted that the amplification factor (AF) is one of the best tools to describe site effects. AF depends on soil parameters that are derived from the geo [...]
|
|
9.
|
It has been observed repeatedly in the post-earthquake investigations that buildings having frequency similar to soil frequency (coming from H/V for example) exhibit sign [...]
|
|
10.
|
The term “spatial variability of seismic ground motions” denotes the differences in amplitude and phase content of seismic motions recorded over extended areas or wit [...]
|
guest ::
email alert
or subscribe to the 
RSS feed.