Uncertainty Analysis of Bearing Capacity of Soils Obtained from Field Plate Load Tests


Abstract eng:
Field plate load test is still regarded as the most suitable technique to obtain load-settlement response of foundations resting on soil/rock, and find its place in several codes of practice worldwide. The loadsettlement data obtained from plate load tests is routinely used in the evaluation of several design parameters of soil, such as bearing capacity, settlement of foundations, modulus of subgrade reaction, Young's modulus, etc. However, these tests often produce unrealistic results, due to various sources uncertainties in testing procedures, and may create chaos in the design decisions, if not properly accounted for. In this paper, a failed field plate load test is discussed and various uncertainties associated with the field testing are identified. The effects of these uncertainties on the load-settlement behavior are systematically analysed, through a series of laboratory plate load tests, simulating the field conditions. By comparing the results obtained from the laboratory and field load tests, it is observed that the bearing resistance of the soil is highly overestimated due to non-maintained load testing. Based on laboratory load test data, resistance factors are derived for each stage of loading, which when used with nonmaintained load test data, can partially compensative the error associated with this uncertainty on the load-settlement response.

Contributors:
Publisher:
Research Publishing, No:83 Genting Lane, #08-01, Genting Building, 349568 SINGAPORE
Conference Title:
Conference Title:
5th Asian-Pacific Symposium on Structural Reliability and its Applications
Conference Venue:
Singapore (SG)
Conference Dates:
2012-05-23 / 2012-05-25
Rights:
Text je chráněný podle autorského zákona č. 121/2000 Sb.



Record appears in:



 Record created 2014-11-18, last modified 2014-11-18


Original version of the author's contribution as presented on CD, .:
Download fulltext
PDF

Rate this document:

Rate this document:
1
2
3
 
(Not yet reviewed)